owned both a 1971 (traded in ) and 1976 (sold in 1984) Firebird Esprit. just the basic engine, etc. but still a lot of fun to drive. I added to the 1976 model external basic gauges (rpm, water, oil), trip info gadget, CB radio, 8-track player in the locking glove compartment, and fog lamps in the honeycomb front grille cut outs. I liked watching James Garner's Rockford Files tv program with the J-turn and chase scenes with his stunt driver skills. I think it was a Formula model scaled down to look like the lower tier Esprit (for his more "modest" means) but had the dual exhaust, roll bars, stiffer susp, greater HP, etc. Vicariously, I was driving the Esprit that was really a Formula.
The cars are in fact quite different. Cosmetics aside the engines shifters etc. were different. Firebirds handling was better. Worked on and driven both and would take the Firebird. That is why I have a '76 TA. Plus you and get the true documentation on them where there are more Camaro Rally cars on the road than they built.
I would disagree with that, you need to do some research about the Firebird's history.
General Motors killed the 2 seat Pontiac Banshee after Chevrolet lobbied against this potential competitor to the Corvette, and as a result of that, to soften the blow, Pontiac was allowed to market a version of the Camaro. The 67-68 was very close to the Camaro sharing components, starting with the 1969 model Pontiac put their distinct touch on the F body. With the 2nd generation F bodies Pontiac made it their own car, all one has to do is look the year to year development, when the pony car market dried up Chevrolet pretty much stopped developing the Camaro, where Pontiac refined both the styling and performance. Look and compare a 1974 and a 1981 Firebird to a Camaro, the Chevy looks pretty much the same, the Firebirds look totally different. Pontiac kept the Formula and Trans Am models going, while Chevrolet dropped the Z28 and SS models, only bring back the Z28 after Pontiac's runaway success with the Trans Am in the mid 70s. As for value the 2nd generation Pontiac F bodies seem to command more money than similar Chevrolet F bodies.
Also Pontiac refined the suspension to the point driving a Formula/Trans Am handling wise is a cut above their Camaro counterparts.
@jwillieb not to get into a heated debate but yes, I do understand that 70 was a mid-year introduction. But calling the late production 69’s a 70 would be a new thing to me however I have seen a small contingent call the 1970 model year 70-1/2. But yeah feel this is nitty gritty details that even the average Firebird enthusiast is willing to overlook.
I know I was just trying to get a reaction from him
@Firechicken313 nothing insulting about Honda. I put my 69 GP up to make room for an 8th Gen Civic Si and I harbor no regrets.
I don’t have a problem with any cars or brands I didn’t like he called Firebirds lower class
Hmm don't know where you looked but never had a problem finding good quality ones.
You will be sorry!😎
@TOG awesome engine, however the premise of the article was the most expensive car from each generation. Definitely worth a mention, but there can only be one “most expensive”
@TOG What really pushes the 70 RA IV up there is rarity. 71-72 you only had one choice in engine plus the RA IV has that mythical quality around it. In a way, I think it is spiritually the engine that best suits the idea around that Trans Am for it's namesake, but the 455 HO is certainly the better choice if you want a car that's a monster from stoplight to stoplight. My father has a 4-speed equipped '72 and thought it was an excellent street machine but always felt the 400 Pontiac was a better balanced engine.
Hey TOG, like this one?
nice wheels
Yeah, like that.
How do you past or insert a photo?
Thanks!
TOG
Saw one a couple weeks ago at the Pontiac Nationals. Rare sight.
Many don’t even know they exist.
Why a chevy 454? not the hard to find a a Pontiac 455. Due to construction of the block a much more reliable and stronger engine.