Movie cars can be just as famous as the human stars on screen. Among the most recognizable movie cars is the 1967 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 "Eleanor" from the 2000 remake of Gone in 60 Seconds. It turns out that building your own Eleanor clone can land you in legal trouble, as one YouTube creator found out this week. This case is not new, so let's look back at how B is for Build got into this mess.
Read the entire article on Hagerty.com:
"Toby" was my uncle. My mother was his sister. Denice is a gold digger *****. "Toby" was a 'Bad Boy' and that is apparently what Denise wanted.
All of the 11 siblings put up a lot of money to finance "Toby's" Gone in 60 Seconds II. His death at the Tonawanda, NY industrial park shocked us all ...
The legal battle with Denise to settle the 11 siblings' claim against the estate was finally settled less than a year ago.
This is a shameless money grab by Denice. Her "company" that builds the replicas for hundreds of thousands of dollars are nice, but nowhere worth the price. Anyone can build a similar quality car in their garage for 1/3 the cost.
She finds anyone that is innocently building something similar to "Eleanor", waits until it is nearly built and then has her attorney send a threatening letter that they will be taken to court unless they pay a "licensing fee" of tens of thousands of dollars. I can't go into details, but that is exactly what happened to a family member who built an exquisite "1967 Mustang" that is 10x the car they build. They make money off the "licensing" and are not true, passionate car people.
This copyright claim is garbage. Any good lawyer would have fought in court arguing "fair use" without permission due to the fact that they are referring to a publicly known entity. Every car guy knows the Eleanor name. You can't sue someone for using the Eleanor name any more than you could for every YouTube channel that mentions the Ford name then. So the the issue is the making profit off the video that has the name Eleanor mentioned in it. I think that would fall under the "freedom of expression" clause of the first amendment. Film is art. Film is expression. You are taking this man's expression from him by saying what he can and cannot do with his art. Here is a perfect example. If the Eiffel Tower is copyright then is painting the Eiffel Tower copyright too? No. It's his interpretation. Shame he didn't get a better attorney.
How the hell can companies sell the parts to make a eleanor but the person that buys the parts is the one at fault. It seems like the as said below gold digging bitch does not want to spend the money to go after the company that sold the parts it is far cheaper to go after the little guy that she feels that her lawyers can push over and get more bang for her buck.This would be like saying that we are not going to worry about the guy bringing drugs into our country but we are going to nail the user for buying a little bag of drugs.
Chances are the car was "seized" because B is for Build couldn't afford the legal battle. So he gave them the car and took down the videos to make the whole problem go away. And the video may have been monetized, but I'm willing to bet that most people who were watching were interested in how to turn a new Mustang into an old one. Most viewers could probably care less that it was an "Eleanor" clone. In the end it's going to work against Denice. She probably lost any support and fans she had, and due to the Streisand Effect, drove a ton more viewers to B is for Build. I'm one of them, I came to the channel because of the suit. I've enjoyed watching them build that latest 2015(?) Mustang into a 67 coupe.